Online Users Page


QN

Previous notifications:
4 years ago
New Blog Entry In .:A-MAN:. lists stuff!
11 years ago
Regular accepted your friend request
More..
62umer936
3 years ago
People seem to love tailwind but idk it just seems like a lot to deal with? Bootstrap feels more straightforward?
Back

Please Login To Post

32CJ101
3 years ago
@.:A-MAN:. Yeah true. I just ended up using tailwind because I didn't want to be restricted by default styles and you have a way larger range of motion with it. It got really comfy when I got used to it. You can't really compare it to bootstrap, because it's meant to be an all-around styling system rather than a rigid framework. Their docs have some neat examples.
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@CJ101 yeah you kinda have to know what components you used if you wanna use a custom bootstrap to reduce the size, but then again, because bootstrap is so common, assuming you use the official CDN it's basically free cuz of the odds you've downloaded it somewhere else and have it cached.
Reply
32CJ101
3 years ago
I'm not sure how bootstrap works since it's not really compiled unless used with a framework-specific package based on it (we use vue-bootstrap at work), but tailwind will purge any unused styles, keyframes, to reduce package size, which I like.
Reply
32CJ101
3 years ago
@.:A-MAN:. it's probably my favorite part about it, tbh. Like this
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@CJ101 Ok, the color thing is definitely fair. Bootstrap seems unnecessarily conservative with their theming out of the box. That is one aspect that I wish was different.
Reply
32CJ101
3 years ago
@.:A-MAN:. I can kind of, but I have more flexibility with component styling in tailwind. I'm somewhat limited in color spectrum on bootstrap, too, whereas I have a muuuch larger range of shades to choose from w/ tailwind, and, again, I don't have to write any rules or pull out a color picker, I can just chuck it into class names. Bootstrap is made to just include and build a bootstrap interface, whereas with tailwind you can make look like a ton of different styles without customizing it beyond stock.
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@CJ101 but you can do that with bootstrap too?
Reply
32CJ101
3 years ago
Also, I can prototype for multiple breakpoints all in one line, so once I'm done fiddling with the html, I can just clean it up by grouping it under one class name in the .css.
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@CJ101 each to his own, I guess
Reply
32CJ101
3 years ago
@umer936 I'm not writing out whole properties, I'm using tailwind shorthands, which I can do in one line. I get that it's "solving" a problem that doesn't necessarily plague anyone, but it noticeably speeds up my ui creation time
Reply
32CJ101
3 years ago
@umer936 Because it feels faster to write
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@umer936 Right?
Reply
62umer936
3 years ago
@CJ101
...but then why use that when it can just be a classname in SCSS?
Reply
32CJ101
3 years ago
I honestly like tailwind a lot. If you don't want to write it all out per tag, simply make a css attribute with @apply and boom, a whole styled component under one classname.
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@umer936 oh it's good, it's just one less download you're required to have. I still use it for some things occasionally, but just having the option to not use it for simple projects is great.
Reply
62umer936
3 years ago
@.:A-MAN:. Eh. I thought jQuery was really good. Everyone seems to be so excited to remove it, but basically every JS library is large and bloated.

I'm removing it in places as I go along, but didn't find it a big deal either way.
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@umer936 I'm so glad we can count on modern JS so we don't need to rely on jQuery anymore.
Reply
62umer936
3 years ago
@BlueLake2 This is kinda how I felt looking through it.

My apps need to be maintained for 20ish years and tailwind doesn't feel like it will last so easily.
I do use Bootstrap, but every few years I can just do a migration to the new version and it looks more "modern" or whatever.

Like right now I'm getting rid of tons of stuff that use jQuery.

TailwindCSS seems like it would just be a bad path to develop stuff for the long term on.
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@BlueLake2 sounds about right
Reply
38BlueLake2 3 years ago
I think I wrote a long status a while ago about how much I hate tailwind. It's cluttered, hard-to-read, and is the source of so many problems that become hard to discover. My girlfriend swears by it, but her team also maintains a project that's pretty isolated from the rest of her company's stack so they have more ownership and overall better comprehension.

I feel like tailwind could be great for fast mockups, but if I'm building anything that I'd have to read and understand at a glance 1+ years down the road then I'd be going with something else
Reply
62umer936
3 years ago
@.:A-MAN:. Same. My boss wants me to use it tho bc he's heard that people love it
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
*too -_-
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@umer936 Yeah I feel like bootstrap has just the right amount of helper classes for common stuff without getting to niche. Just type up some css like a normal person if you have a special case?
Reply
62umer936
3 years ago
but IMO it feels weird to use and a lot of clutter
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
@umer936 that seems... verbose.
Reply
62umer936
3 years ago
@.:A-MAN:. It's the HOT HOT HOT new thing.

People absolutely swear by it. Basically there are classes defined in css so you do <div class="py-8 text-base leading-6 space-y-4 text-gray-700 sm:text-lg sm:leading-7"></div> to define the style for the div

See: https://play.tailwindcss.com/
Reply
70.:A-MAN:.
3 years ago
Hadn't heard of tailwind but bootstrap is very straightforward imo.
Reply
v3.2